The Latest News
Being told that you have cancer can be scary. Discovering that your health insurance plan doesn’t give you access to leading cancer centers may make the diagnosis even more daunting.
As insurers in the plans set up under the Affordable Care Act shrink their provider networks and slash the number of plans that offer out-of-network coverage, some consumers are learning that their treatment options can be limited.
One reader wrote to Kaiser Health News last month saying that she was dismayed to learn that none of the plans offered on the New York health insurance marketplace provides access to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, where she is a patient.
Memorial Sloan Kettering is a well-regarded cancer center that is affiliated with two key organizations: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the National Cancer Institute. The cancer center participates in New York’s Essential Plan, which is available to lower income people on the state’s exchange, but doesn’t participate in any of the regular plans designated as bronze, silver, gold or platinum.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network is an alliance of 27 cancer centers. Member physicians and researchers develop widely recognized clinical practice guidelines.
The National Cancer Institute recognizes many cancer centers for their scientific leadership and research. The 69 NCI-designated cancer centers can offer patients access to cutting-edge treatments and clinical trials. All 27 NCCN centers are also designated by the NCI.
It’s unclear the extent to which these cancer centers, which are often but not always affiliated with large academic institutions, are included in the provider networks of marketplace plans nationwide. A survey by Avalere Health in 2015 found that three-quarters of NCI-designated cancer centers said they participated in at least some exchange plans, and 13 percent said they were included in all exchange plans in their state. However, of the 25 percent of centers that didn’t participate in any exchanges, many were in states with large numbers of exchange enrollees, including Texas and New York, the survey reported.
Does it matter if someone with a cancer diagnosis gets treatment at one of these centers rather than at a community hospital or some other site? Research suggests that it may. A study found that adult patients between the ages of 22 and 65 who were newly diagnosed with one of several types of cancer — breast, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, gastric or bile duct — were 20 percent to 50 percent more likely to die from the disease if they were initially treated at a place other than an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center.
The study, which analyzed the five-year survival rates of nearly 70,000 patients whose cancers were reported in the Los Angeles County cancer registry between 1998 and 2008, was published in the journal Cancer in 2015.
Researchers hypothesize that the cancer centers’ multidisciplinary approach to decision-making, supportive care and access to cutting-edge treatment, among other things, contribute to the superior outcomes at comprehensive cancer centers, said Dr. Julie Wolfson, a pediatric oncologist at the Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship at the University of Alabama at Birmingham who was a co-author of the study.
“The goal is to find out what is different about these places and then disseminate that to other” treatment sites, Wolfson said.
Often there are factors aside from survival rates that contribute to a patient’s decision about where to go for care, said Dr. Robert Carlson, CEO of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Those factors can include support systems that patients already have in place and concerns about nonmedical costs, such as housing and transportation.
“Most patients, if offered the option to go to a major cancer center — especially if it involves traveling — will decline it,” Carlson said.
Some cancer centers aim to give patients access to both types of facilities. City of Hope cancer center’s main academic campus is in Duarte, Calif., in Los Angeles County. That’s the best site for patients when their cancers are rare or advanced, optimal treatment isn’t clear or they could participate in a clinical trial, said Dr. Harlan Levine, the chief executive of the City of Hope Medical Foundation. But the cancer center also owns a network of 14 community cancer clinics located in Southern California for patients who can be effectively treated in that setting, he said.
City of Hope participates in two plans that are offered on California’s exchange, Blue Shield and Anthem, and its physicians are in-network for the exchange’s Oscar health plan. But most people don’t check access to cancer care when they shop for a plan. “Cancer is an infrequent purchase from a marketing point of view,” Levine said. In many cases, patients don’t realize their lack of access until after their diagnosis, when it may be too late.
Cancer centers may try to work with patients to enable their treatment.
“We understand that each patient has a unique financial situation and we work with our patients, especially those in active treatment, to ensure they receive the care needed and that their treatment is uninterrupted,” said Ruth Landé, senior vice president for patient care revenue at Memorial Sloan Kettering. “We have patient financial services representatives available to assist patients who do not have health insurance or whose insurance may not cover all charges.”
Patients who believe that it’s critical to be treated at a cancer center that’s not in their insurance network do have some recourse.
When people receive a cancer diagnosis, it’s “overwhelming,” said Anna Howard, a principal for policy development at the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Action Network. “You may not be aware of the fact that if your insurance plan says you don’t have coverage at a cancer center you can file an appeal.”
Appealing the insurer’s decision doesn’t guarantee success, however.
“Anecdotally,” Howard said, “we hear that it depends on the specific individual and type of cancer.”
Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent news service that is part of the nonpartisan Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Michelle Andrews is on Twitter: @mandrews110.
Since the beginning of 2016, four ObamaCare co-op insurance plans have failed. That means tens of thousands of Americans are feeling the pain, all thanks to the so-called Affordable Care Act:
A new wave of failures among ObamaCare’s nonprofit health insurers is disrupting coverage for thousands of enrollees and raising questions about whether regulators could have acted earlier to head off some of the problems.
The latest round of failures poses an even thornier problem than earlier cases because enrollees’ coverage is now being disrupted in the middle of the year. That can increase patients’ out of pocket costs and make it harder to keep the same doctors.
In Illinois, Oregon and Ohio, a combined total of about 92,000 people are being forced to find a new plan. A co-op in a fourth state, Connecticut, will last until the end of the year.
Ouch. That’s 92,000 more people who have had their health care plan unceremoniously disrupted, all thanks to ObamaCare.
Are you one of those people? If so, could you take just a few minutes to answer a couple of questions to help us learn more about your experience with ObamaCare’s failing co-ops?